|
ORBS - THE MYSTERIOUS WORLD OF THE UNSEEN ORBS
My experiences
|
|
Sat, 14 Oct 2006
|
The total orb experience.
As well as studying orbs and researching their
appearences on digital camera in the daytime and
night time, I read other information of the
phenomenon we call orbs. It's very intresting.
The true metaphysical believers have their
stories and explanations about orbs and the
skeptical unbelievers have their stories and
explanations about orbs. Both groups bring great
theories to the table of content that could seem
to explain the orb occurrences in either
direction. Either direction meaning the orbs are
living entities (spirits,fairies,alien
probes,dimensional amebas) or the orbs are
accidental findings (dust particles, rain drops,
water particles in the air, mist, bugs). We also
have to consider the fact that all we have within
us to explain this orb phenomenon is the thought
process at which we approach it, the thought
forms that we as humans have been programmed with
since childhood mostly determine the outcome of
how we explain these orbs. As like in the field
of ufology, some theories seem fitting while some
theories seem ridiculous and in many ufo cases
the circumstances the evidence and the witnesses
involved are so overwhelming that there's no 3rd
dimensional human way possible to explain the
advanced upper dimensional physics involved in
the very real ufo events that have occured in the
past. With orbs, yes I believe that some can be
dust particles, rain drops, water particles in
the air, mist, or bugs. At the same time, I
believe that many orbs are a living entity such
as spirits, fairies, alien probes,
dimensional amebas or other upper dimensional
frequency intelligence yet to be uncovered and
understood by our (un)conventional 3rd
dimensional scientific community. In my
experiences with photographing orbs, before every
individual picture I snap, I always wipe clean my
camera lens. I've taken pictures when water
particles were in the air and in the same spot.
Within 2 minutes and out of say 10 pictures taken
some have orbs and some don't. If water particles
were the cause for the skeptic's orb wouldn't all
the 10 pictures have the water particle skeptic's
orbs in them? The same goes with dust particles.
How about the orbs that are round and white that
moved with what seems to be intelligence and that
when they are caught on camera in the process of
moving they leave a trail from the spot they were
to the spot they are. Water particles don't do
that on camera. Dust don't do that on camera.
Mist just shows up as a dense dull fog. Bugs
caught on camera in the act of flying are
definitely not round, colorful, or bright see
through orbs of light with images and paterns in
them. Rain drops on digital camera can easily be
distinguished between orbs and drops of water,
even when the flash from the camera illuminates
the rain drop. The average rain drop thats
captured on digital camera with a flash looks
like a little solid white orb, looking totally
different than the paranormal orbs that come in
many sizes and have many images within them. Then
there's the rain drop that looks like a orb
moving straight up leaving a tail, giving it the
appearance of a orb moving upwards. This type of
rain drop appears like this on a digital image
because when the camera snaps the rain
drop image in motion, the initial flash
illuminates the rain drop and then because the
rain drop is in the process of falling down the
illuminated rain drop leaves a small trail going
down at the same time showing the illuminated
rain drop above the trail. This gives the
impression that the rain drop looks like a small
white orb in the process of moving upward. As
complicated as this may sound to some people,
it's still easy to distinguish between a orb and
a rain drop illuminated by a camera's flash.
There's also the skeptic's theory that newer
digital cameras that are used to capture orbs are
very small cameras and the flash is positioned
too close to the camera's lens. It's been said
that because of the camera's flash being to close
to the camera's lens, light infractions emitted
from the flash interfere with the picture, the
result being camera flash orbs emitted from the
flash itself showing up in the picture which the
skeptics account for all orb pictures taken with
digital camera with the flash on. If this were
the case then wouldn't this mean that every
picture taken with a newer digital camera have
orbs showing up in all their photos taken?
Posted 10:53
|
5 comments
|
No, only the ones taken in dusty/misty
conditions. In addition to a flash close to the
lens, you need something for the light to
reflect off of, close enough to the lens to be
out of focus. This is a known problem with built-
in flash, and photographers avoid it by using a
separate flash unit.
|
hi
hi, there are no such things as orbs.
|
orbs
Wasnt the world supposed to be flat until we
opened our mind and our points of view? The same
goes for orbs.
|
My experience with Orbs
I have over 150 picts of orbs.
One in particular taken during daytime, with no
flash - and hundreds of orbs all over me, and my
companions.
I have some picts taken within seconds of the
one prior.
If Orbs are dust, how come some of the pictures
taken in the same environment have orbs, and
some do not. I do believe, that dust can be
captured, but why am I the only one out of my
friends to capture dust? Whether using my camera
or my friends cameras.. Seems dust must be
following me around, and likes to hang by my
head. Not to mention the faces in the dust that
can be seen. I never knew dust particles to be
so intelligent!
Plus, the energy of the orbs can be felt and
seen by a few..how does dust play into that?
|
Flatearthers
Ashleys comment is really stupid, nobody knows
exactly what they are but saying they dont exist
is like sticking your head in the sand!
Many people such as myself see orbs with our own
eyes! I have no idea what they are and why I can
see them, they interact with certain people but
not others. The photography is interesting but I
dont need photographs to prove to me what I know
is real.
|
Post a Comment:
|
|
|
|
|
